![](../image/11book.jpg) |
|
Many people run and hide when they hear the word “war”. They feel war
means death, violent, destruction, human displacement, widows and orphans, or
becoming the slave or the lower class to the victor. They fail to see that
war in the long run may actually be peace, prosperity, and happiness.
According to the Webster dictionary, war could also be a state of hostility,
conflict, antagonism, or struggle between opposing forces towards a particular
end. This means that war is not necessary bombs and machines guns, or
death and destruction, but it is actually the will to achieve a particular goal
for self, family, community, or nation. If this is so, then war is
actually a blessing not a curse.
War therefore, symbolisms the
courage, sacrifice, and determination a person or a community is willing to put
forth for the economic, political, and social betterment of the society at
large. It is the willingness and the ability of an individual or a group to
wage war for the progress of their descendants that increases their relevance,
respect, and status even by the standard of others. War is a state and not a
permanent activity to yield a certain result. We are always at war either with
our siblings, coworkers, spouses, children, or extended family. War may be
violent or bloody, if it gets that far, but it is usually and ultimately a
battle of wills. The victor is usually the most prepared and the most
determined, and not necessarily the most right or moral. Nature and God only
intervenes after the victor’s established system, which was built on a wrong
foundation, eventually wears itself out.
Contrarily to Christian
expectation, I actually believe that the Prophet of the Koran was a prophet of
God and I proved it in my book titled “The Political and Spiritual Purpose of
the Holy Land” even with Biblical principles. I appreciate how he used war to
bring change and progress to his people, and how till this day, millions of
people of non-Arab descent still bring political and economic relevance to Arab
lands. My only concern is how the African Muslims use his teachings to promote
Arab interest on African soil instead of using it to enhance indigenous African
culture and history economically and politically. One of the Arab/Kurdish
Caliphate I will forever respect and appreciate is Saladin. He did not only
understand the value and purpose for war, he also knew how to undermine the
strength of his opponent for the betterment of his people.
Just 88 years after Europe took
control of the Jerusalem region (current Israel or Palestine); Saladin came from
the north of Iraq and marched through most of Arabia towards Jerusalem. He did
not have trained fighters. He recruited farmers and shepherds along the way and
trained them to fight. All he counted on was the Arab will to confront and
chase out the European settlers for the sake of their God, their culture, and
the happiness of their children. King Richard I of England, who lead the
European Crusade to keep the Holy Land, had the Knight Templar (experience
fighters), naval boats (to transports fighters from one battle front to another
for surprise attacks), and technology (more advance swords, spears, and shield),
but still lost the battle to Saladin. Yes, there was some violence, and victory
went back and forth in terms of captured cities, but the real victory was a
psychological one. King Richard I soon realized that he did not have the
population to maintain possession of the land and the resources to transfer
fighters between Europe and the Holy Land. So the Europeans packed up and
left. This ended what we call the Crusades. |
|
The Political & Spiritual Purpose of the
Holy Land
![](../image/ads.ht1.jpg) |
|
|
According to the book titled “The Political and Spiritual Purpose of the Holy
Land”, Jesus, an African Israelite and a direct descendant of the original
Canaan (Palestine), despite the fact that his ancestor - Abraham originally was
a Semite (African/Arab lineage, not European Jew), was a man that fought wars
with two nations at the same time. He waged a political war against the Roman
Empire and waged an economic and cultural war against the Jews. Many Christians
choose to see Jesus as a spiritual being and this is because in his last three
years, he showed that complete spirituality with God is a stable and viable
economy, politics, and social order. Against the Jews, he healed people on a
Sabbath day because people deserved to be free and happy at any and all times.
Unlike majority of the Jews, he learned to read and write in Egypt, and even
went up to the temple to preach and read to the people. Only the Jewish
authority could read, write, and preach, but Jesus showed that knowledge and the
expression of it was true power and freedom. Despite the fact that he came from
Nazareth, one of the most inferior places in old Israel, he taught the people
never to owe or be in debt to anyone, including the almighty Romans by saying
that any coin with the inspiration of Caesar must be given to Caesar. He also
made them reason about why they were using Caesar’s coins on Jewish soil. While
many Jews discriminated against non-Jews, Jesus challenged the people to be so
proud of their culture and ways of life by taking it to the ends of the earth,
which meant to embrace all peoples. Most importantly, He taught the people to
rise above oppression and conquer fear with the courage of love. He taught that
when an oppressor demands your coat that you must give him your scarf as well.
This means that it is not the fear of his strength that made you comply to his
wishes, but the courage to disobey even in the supposed state of
powerlessness. You gave, but not what he wanted and his power will be taken
from him. This is the original civil disobedience.
Against the Romans and their
Empire, Jesus basically ignored them. It was like they did not even exist to
him. The best way to treat a bully is not to give him any attention. Through
out the Biblical account of Jesus, he almost never mentioned them in his
teachings or in his parables. It was the Roman officials that came to him for
healing or ideas, and when he advised them, he responded from his cultural and
social concepts, which were supposed to be inferior to Roman ways (A follower of
God cherishes his culture and history). Jesus bore his name, he spoke his
language, wore his traditional attire, observed his tradition except the ones
that needed modification, he ate his food, he brought peace and happiness to his
people, and told people who he was. He never adopted the colonized ways of the
Romans. This is what it is to be true to your God and self. He was free and
independent because he used everything God had given him to bless and prosper
himself and his community. He even went as far as telling the Roman Governor
during the trial for his death that the Governor had no power over him. If
Jesus had begged, he may have lived, but even in death he was still free and
independent for the progress of his community and followers. Just about 250
years after Jesus’ death, the entire Roman Empire, including the Emperor,
became followers of Jesus, and today, it is the followers of Jesus that are
helping Israel to get its land back. But how does this war issue relate to
Biafra and the Niger-Delta in Nigeria?
So far, war is simply a state of
disobedience to a certain circumstance or order that is against the progress or
prosperity of an individual or people which may lead to violence and death, but
is ultimately the will to see a better tomorrow. I was asked by my Cultural
Anthropology professor in 1997 to specifically do a research on the Nigerian
Civil War and give a presentation to the class on it. Up till that point, all I
knew about the war was that the Igbos wanted to break away from Nigeria and
Nigeria won the war. After doing my research, I must thank and congratulate
the Igbos for been courageous and determined enough to wage a war that was
necessary for their future happiness against all odds. There is nothing wrong
with a people standing up against what they consider as oppression. The only
problem I had with the Igbos that caused them the war was that they were greedy
and selfish in their implementation. Nigeria was supposed to get independence
around 1957, but the British wanted to give power to an illiterate North that
they could manipulate at will from England. The British made sure that by 1960,
the less sophisticated Northerners, who could not challenge or oppose them
mentally got more than majority of the power in all level of government. After
the British left, the Northerners, like they still do, continued British rule
and it was not to the benefit of the Nigerian nation. The North ruled for the
North and their colonial masters - Britain. This made the Igbos and many
Nigerians upset. The Igbo soldier in 1966 took it upon themselves to get rid of
the Northern leaders, and I believe a few Yoruba and Igbo leaders (who had
little power if any at all).
The Igbos wanted to replace the
colonial Northern rule that still exist to the day with a leadership for the
Nigeria people without British influence, but the North was already angry by
then and started killing igbos in the North and all over. The Igbos could not
take it any more so they declared their independence within a year. What the
Igbos did by trying to correct a British – Northern established government was
right, along with their declaration of independence, but their implementation
was wrong. The Igbos, maybe out of greed, fear, or selfishness, started
invading their neighbors, killing them, and taking their cities. I guess they
felt that the more land they could control, the weaker the powerful North will
be. The Igbos went through Bendel (Edo and Delta) and reached (or almost
reached) Lagos in the far west, when the Nigeria military started beating them
back. By the Igbos invading their neighbors, they turned a godly war even by
the standard of the Koran into a situation of distrust. Neighbors that would
have stood for and by them because the Igbo cause was justified began to see the
Nigerian military as their liberators. If the Igbos could hold the Nigerian
military with all their less sophisticated weapons for 3 years without support
form their neighbors, then they would have succeeded if only they declared
independence and defended their ONLY land. The Igbos ultimately lost because
their neighbors and military cut off their food supply. If the Igbos had not
invaded their neighbors, the rest would have ultimately declared independence as
well because the North always had nothing to offer till this day except military
coups, Islam, and a broken economy. This is the only reason the British made
sure they handed Nigerian power to the Northerners. The rest of Nigeria had to
choose between a better Nigeria for all tomorrow and a new Igbo rule, so they
chose the former.
The Niger-Delta must learn the
act of war from Saladin, Jesus, and Biafra. You do not need to take permission
or make deals with your oppressor to be free and happy. If you want the oil
companies out of your land, send their workers out and shut the plants down
totally without negotiations. If you are unhappy with the way Nigeria is
accounting for your oil and the revenue percentage you are getting, shut the oil
plants down completely. No drilling, no demands, no negotiations whatsoever.
If you want to declare independence from Nigeria because you feel you can govern
yourself better, like Ukraine from Soviet Union, go ahead and declare it. If
you feel that it is necessary to start electing your own presidents and
governors without Nigerian interference, then go ahead. Niger-Delta must be
prepared for Nigerian resistance because it is natural. We produce over 90% of
Nigerian revenue, so the will want to fight for it. The Niger-Delta should be
prepared for war even if it has to become violent, or accept their position of
being the slaves and prostitutes for the British influenced WAZOBIA system of
Nigeria. Even in heaven, God and Angel Michael fought a war against Lucifer and
his evil angels. In the news, you will hear that Niger-Delta demand this and
demand that before they will release hostages. You will read that the
Niger-Delta war leader was arrested on his way to have a meeting with Obasanjo
in Abuja. Only Black people will do such a thing, not Europeans and Arabs, and
that is why they rule the world. What is your business with Abuja and
hostages? If the hostages do not run out, then they may be removed
permanently. Is Abuja the oil plant you should be blowing up? Is it not better
to have no oil plant and be free than to be the slave because you have oil? War
is good only if it is well implemented for a just cause. A Niger-Delta war will
be a godly and justified war only if the people have the courage and will to
declare independence and die for the freedom and happiness of their children
against Northern or WAZOBIA rule of Nigeria.
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin |
|
|