The earliest Greek alphabet was made by the Pelasgians, it
was lost and later reintroduced by Kadmus to Boeotia. Another Pelasgian, Evander
of Arcadia introduced writing to the Italians. This script was used to make the
first fifteen characters of the Latin script according to Pliny and Plutarch.
Pliny says that one of the Aegean scripts was created by an
Egyptian named Menos. An Egyptian creation of one of the early Greek alphabets
is not out of the question because the early Predynastic Egyptians used the
Proto-Saharan script as did the founders of the 12th Dynasty. Moreover, the
Tiles of Rameses II, published by F. Hitching, in The Mysterious World,
are analogous to the early Greek characters.
EGYPTIANS
The Egyptians established many colonies in ancient Europe.
The Egyptians called themselves Melampodes or "Blackfeet". The Egyptians
were also called Danaans in Greek history. According to Hyainus in
Fabula, and Apollonius Rhodius when the Danaans came to Greece they were a
combination of diverse African tribes.
When the Danaans came to Greece they took away part of
Argolis from the Canaanites. The Danaans took the Mysteries of Themoporia and
the oracle of Dodona to Greece. This view is supported by the discovery of an
inscribed stone in the Peloponnese that had Egyptian writing on it dating to the
Vth Dynasty of Egypt. Greek traditions speak of Egyptian colonies founded by
Cecrops who settled Atica, Danaus the brother of Aegyptus was
the founder of Argolis. Danaus is alleged to have taught the Greeks agriculture
and metallurgy.
MYCENEANS
The ancient Myceneans were Blacks. These ancient people came
from Crete, and the Western Sahara. Alain Anselin has shown how many of these
Myceneans spoke Dravidian languages especially the Termils of Asia Minor.
The cities of Troy, Mycenae, Tiryns, Thebes and Orochomenos
were founded by the Eteocretans or "Real Minoans", as opposed to the
later Greco-Cretans. These Eteocretans spoke a Manding language.
Mycenean art gives ample evidence of the rich and varied
culture shared by the Africans of Mycenae. Africans are depicted in hunting and
war motifs on artifacts recovered from the Shaft Graves at Mycenae.
The best known African artifacts from Mycenae include the
"Stag Hunt", "Lion and Spearman Hunt" and the "Siege Scene" depicted on the
Silver Rhyton Cup. All of these artifacts date to 1500 BC
Achaeans
By 1200 BC, much of the Mycenae civilization was under the
control the Achaeans. The Achaeans later founded other city-states in
Greece. After conquering the Mycenaeans, the Achaeans formed the Greek states of
Peloponnesus. Their major cities: Mycenae and Tiryns in Argolis, and Pylos
Messenia were originally founded by other Pelasgian groups.
Between 1200-800 BC, the Achaeans began to take control of
the Greek mainland , the southern part of the Balkan Peninsula, Crete and
numerous islands in the Aegean Sea. The Achaeans conquered the Nubian, Egyptian
and Phoenician armies at Troy. Some of the troops fighting with the Achaeans
were Indo-European speaking people.
ORIGIN OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS
There is disagreement over where the Europeans originated and
when they spread across Europe. Dr. M. Gimbutas maintains that
Europeans had their origin in the Pontic steppe country on the north coast of
the Black Sea and began to expand into Europe as Kurgan nomads after 4000 BC In
1987, Dr. C. Renfrew hypothesized that the Indo-Europeans lived in eastern
Anatolia and spread into Europe around 7000 years ago with the spread of
agriculture. Both of these views have little support based upon the ancestral
culture terms used by the Proto-Indo-European which are predominately of non
Indo-European (I-E) origin. After a comparison of the linguistic, agricultural
and genetic evidence researchers have found little support for both of these
theories. Sokal et al, noted that: "If the IEs originated in situ
by local differentiation only, there should be no significant partial
correlation , since geography should fully explain the observed genetic and
linguistic distances. This was not the case. If the genetics-language
correlation were entirely due to the spread of populations accompanying the
origin of
agriculture, then the origin-of-agriculture model should
suffice, or at least there should be some effect due to origin of agriculture.
But we saw that origin-of-agriculture distances (OOA) cannot reduce the partial
correlations remaining after geography has been held constant."
The genetic evidence supporting the absence of an
Indo-European origin in the Anatolian region is supported by the historical and
archaeological evidence. The north and east of Anatolia was inhabited by
non-Indo-European speakers. It appears that Indo-Europeans did not enter
Anatolia until sometime between 2000 -1800 BC At this time we note the
appearance of Indo-European (Hittite) names in the literary records of the Old
Kingdom of Hatti. And at least as late as 1900 BC Anatolia was basically still
Hattian.
The usual method of Indo-European and Chinese invasion was
two-fold. First, they settles in a country in small groups and were partly
assimilated. Over a period of time their numbers increased. Once they reach a
numerical majority they joined forces with other Indo-European speaking groups
to militarily overthrow the original inhabitants in a specific area and take
political power. Since these communities occupied by the blacks often saw
themselves as residents of a city-state, they would ignored the defeat of their
neighbors. This typified their second form of invasion of the countries formerly
ruled by the Proto-Saharans/Kushites/Blacks.
Blacks have failed even today to recognize that even though
whites are highly nationalistic and engaged in numerous fratricidal wars, they
will unify temporarily to defeat non-European people. As a result in case where
the Blacks have been politically organized into states or Empires, rather than
isolated city-states, the large political units have lasted for hundreds of
years as typified by ancient Egypt, Axum, Mali and ancient Ghana.
D'iakonov on the other hand, believes that the Indo-Europeans
(I-E) homeland was the Balkan-Carpathian region. He has shown that the culture
terms of the I-E group indicate that they made their way across forest-steppe
and deciduous forest zones to settle other parts of the world. This view is
highly probable.
The view that these people were farmers seem unlikely, since
the ideal farming areas in Europe were already settled by the Anu and people
from the Fertile African Crescent as discussed in this unit. Instead of being
farmers the I-E people were originally nomads.
The steppes could not have been the homeland of the
Indo-Europeans because it was heavily occupied by the Proto-Saharan people until
after 1300 B.C.In support of an early presence of Indo-European speakers on the
steppes many scholars maintain that the Andronovo cultures and wheeled vehicles
are markers of Indo-European "High" culture.
But this theory has been proven to be unsupportable by the
archeological and linguistic data. The civilizations and economy that
characterized "Old Europe" are foreign to the Indo-European culture portrayed in
the Indo-Aryan literature.
Many scholars use the chariot and horsemanship as an ethnic
marker for the Indo-Europeans. But it can not be proven that the horse drawn
chariot was an exclusive Indo-European marker. The wheeled vehicles were used in
Mesopotamia and the Indus Valley before the 3rd millennium. The presence of
pre-Dynasty and early Dynasty wheeled toy animals from Egypt and elsewhere
support the view that the wheel was a well known technology to the Kushites
before the expansion of the Indo Europeans.
This view is further supported by the fact that the IE roots
for "wheel" number four. Use of a number to signify the "wheel" illustrates that
this technological innovation must have come from elsewhere and was later
adopted by the Proto-Indo-Europeans after there dispersal.
The horse can not be a marker for the Indo-European dispersal
either. It would appear that in the steppes, the horse was not intensively used
until the iron age. V.M. Masson believes that horse domestication and riding
developed in the 1st millennium BC, on the steppes.
The early I-E were Kurgan nomadic warriors. Kurgan is
a name used by archaeologist for the early Europeans.The term I-E does not refer
to a racial type, because many of the ancient I-E speakers may have been black ,
given the fact that among the depictions of the People of the Sea on Egyptian
monuments their are African people. But today the only I-E people we have are
Caucasian.
Evolving in the Caucasus mountains, the Kurgan folk were
pastoralist. They herded cattle, pigs and sheep.
The Kurgans were a very destructive people. They destroyed
vast regions of forest across Europe. By the Fourth millennium BC, wide tracts
of forests were gone in Europe. Upon their encounter with civilized Africoid
communities, the latter were enslaved while the Kurgans adopted their culture.
The Kurgan warriors used these slaves to grow grain.
The Indo-Europeans remained an insignificant group until they
learned the art of metal working from the Hittites of Asia Minor. This along
with natural disasters that took place around the world after 1600 BC, helped
the Kurgans to infiltrate civilized areas in the Aegean and Indus Valley.
The Kurgan people are also known as the Battle Axe/ Corded
Ware Folk. By the Third millennium BC, the Kurgan were breeding horses and
organized themselves into militarized chiefdoms. The symbol of the warrior class
was the horned helmet common to the Sea Folk and later Vikings. Their common
weapon was the double axe.
The Kurgan folk in small numbers slowly migrated into the
centers of civilization, first in northern Mesopotamia, then India. By 3500 BC,
the Kurgans were invading the Caucasus region. Beginning in 3700 B.C., Old
European settlements had walls built around them to keep out the Kurgan
warriors.
These early I-E people practiced human sacrifice. At the
death of a man his wife was often killed and buried with him.
The Kurgan people mixed with the indigenous Africoid people.
Some of them were made slaves by the warrior elites. If black communities were
more powerful than the Kurgans, they formed an alliance between themselves and
conquered weaker groups. Once the Kurgan tribe became stronger it would knock
off its former ally.
The People of the Sea began to infiltrate the Aegean area
after 1200 BC. These people usually wore horn helmets and used round shields.
Pictures of these nomadic warriors are depicted in courtyard
of Medinet Habu, in Egypt. These white Japhetic Philistine folk
were relocated in Palestine, where two hundred years later they destroyed Sidon
and Troy. This Philistine Kurgan ethnic group is called Phrs in Egyptian
documents.
Another group of Kurgan tribes took Crete. From bases in
Crete, they invaded North Africa west of Egypt. These Kurgan tribesmen were
called Rebou, by the Egyptians. This group formed the white Libyan
population which occupied much of the Delta region of Egypt, before the founding
of Carthage by the Phoenicians.
By 1300 BC, the Dorian tribes invaded Greece and defeated the
Achaeans. The Dorian conquest of Mycenae led to Crete becoming a major center of
Achaean civilization. The Dorians learned the art of writing from the
Phoenicians.
Among the early I-E social relations were patriarchal. The
hereditary warrior class controlled the best lands and large slave populations
made up mainly of the native Blacks and poor Indo-European population. The
landless people served as serfs for the ruling class made up of warriors.
Each Indo-European ethnic group was led by a Basileus.
He was military commander, judge and high priest.
In summary the myths , archaeological and historical evidence
all indicate that Europe was not the homeland of the White race. It would appear
from the evidence that the ancient Greeks were Blacks. Moreover, it is clear
that these blacks taught the Europeans civilization and government and that
these symbols of government and civilization can not be claimed solely as the
property of Europeans.
The historical, archaeological and linguistic evidence proves
that contemporary ancient history text must be re-written to reflect that the
blacks in Europe were not just slaves, but founders of Grecian civilization..
These new history text must, for the first time reflect of the African role in
history so that black children and white children will know the truth about
history, and not just false hoods that deny the existence of a native Grecian
African role in the rise of ancient Greco-Roman civilization.
These blacks in Greece just like African-Americans today
built the culture and civilization of ancient Greece. But their efforts,
unfairly have been ignored and over looked by scholars who knew the
truth, but hid this truth to validate White World Supremacy.